Here is another question that is from CJC H2 Mathematics 9758 Prelim Paper 1. Its a question on differentiation. I think it is simple enough and tests student on their thinking comprehension skills. This is question 6.

A straight line passes through the point with coordinates (4, 3) cuts the positive x-axis at point P and positive y-axis at point Q. It is given that , where and O is the origin.

(i) Show that equation of line PQ is given by .

(ii) By finding an expression for , show that as varies, the stationary value of is , where and are constants to be determined.

Today, I’ll share a little something about Integration by Parts. I want to share this because I observe that several students are over-reliant on the LIATE to perform Integration by Parts. This caused them to overlook/ appreciate its use.

Lets start by reviewing the formula for Integration by Parts

I like to share with students that Integration by Parts have two interesting facts.

It allows us to integrate expression that we cannot integrate. Eg. or inverse trigonometric functions. This is also closely related to how LIATE is established.

This is closely related to point 1. That is, instead of trying to integrate the expression, we are differentiating it instead. And that itself, is a very important aspect.

Next, I like to point out to students that LIATE is a general rule of thumb.
GENERAL – because it does not work 100% of the times. And today, I’ll use an example to illustrate how LIATE actually fails.

Here we observe two terms and . Going by LIATE, we should be differentiating and integrating .

Now observe what happened here, after applying integration by parts, it got “worst”. We are stuck to integrating with an exponential… This should raise some question marks. But we did follow LIATE.

I’ll leave students to try out this on their own. And feel free to ask questions here. Have fun!

Last year, I shared a handful of random interesting questions from the 2016 Prelims. Students feedback that they were quite helpful and gave them good exposure. I thought I share some that I’ve seen this year. I know, its a bit early for Prelims. But ACJC just had their paper 1. 🙂

This is from ACJC 2017 Prelims Paper 1 Question 7. And it is on complex numbers.

7
(a) Given that and , solve for and .

(b) Find the exact values of and , where such that

I’ll put the solutions up if I’m free.

But for students stuck, consider checking this link here for (a) and this link here for (b). These links hopefully enlightens students.

Just FYI, you cannot complex numbers as they are not real…

A gambler bets on one of the integers from 1 to 6. Three fair dice are then rolled. If the gambler’s number appears times (), he wins $ . If his number fails to appear, he loses $1. Calculate the gambler’s expected winnings

So these past months, I have been focusing on harnessing students’ abilities to interpret questions properly. Every line in a question is there for a reason and hold little pieces of information. As a student, you need to piece these information together.

Take the following question as an example:

We have a, b and c=a+2b.
Given further that M is on OC, and point A, B, and M are collinear. Find the ratio of OM:OC.

Now this question looks rather short. Many students will first start by drawing to help them see. To be honest, I was tell students that drawing out vectors is not necessary since it doesn’t yield any marks and we spend 10 minutes trying to figure out how it is supposed to look. We are better learning how to read questions.

Let’s start dissecting

M is on OC tells us that .

A, B, and M are collinear tells us that the points are parallel with a common point. NOTE: Collinear is different from parallel. The former is a proper subset of the latter actually.
This tells us that

Students should have no trouble continuing to solve for and .

So this little exercise is to simply illustrate the importance of learning how to read questions and of course, writing it out.

This problem seem to bug many students, especially J1s who are doing Maclaurin’s series now. Many of the students are not sure how to find the coefficient of . They wonder how to “see” it. So here, I’ll attempt to show a direct method that doesn’t require us to stare and think.

Consider and we are interested to find the coefficient of .

First of all, to apply formula, we rewrite to . This step is based on indices and students should always check that the copied the correct power.

Now consider the formula above that is found in the MF15. We will take the coefficient of that’s found there, taking note that here.

We will end of with the following

Take note we must copy the alongside too and we substitute the in and preserve the .

Simplifying, we have

Here we attempt to factorise out, we need to figure how many (-1)’s we have here to factorise. To find out, we can take to find out how many terms there are. Next, we try to simplify the factorials.

Therefore, the coefficient is .

Note: cannot be further simplified as we do not know if is even or odd. In the event that is even, then and if is odd, then . An example is if we consider instead of , we observe that we will find a which is equals to 1 since .

The following are a list of A-levels topics in H2 Mathematics. I’ve added what I feel is the hardest part of each topic amongst students.

Functions: Finding the range of a composite

Curve Sketching: Sketching curves with unknowns and solving conics’ roots.

Graphing Transformations: Finding the correct transformation the new graph went through from the original.

Inequalities: When there are modulus

Arithmetic Progression & Geometric Progression: Finding the general formula for those interest rate questions

Summation and Series: MI with Trigo

Recurrence Relation: Conjecture

Differentiation: Parametric equations

Maclaurins’ Series: “Hence” parts which require students to either approximate or relate to standard series.

Integration: With trigonometry

Definite Integral: Identify the region they want and crafting the correct rotation formula

Differential Equations: with given substitution. General vs Particular Solution

Vectors I: When no numbers are given, and its just all a, b, c.

Vectors II: Distance between two planes, geometrical interpretations.

Complex Numbers: Locus of half line. Questions combined with vectors.

Probability: story questions which students are still unable to identify the clear events

Permutation & Combination: Honestly, don’t spend too long on this questions, beyond 15 minutes. There are too many ways you can suffer at the hands of this question. I can’t even permute it.

Normal Distribution: Continuity Correction after approximation

Binomial & Poisson Distribution: When we need to find for a passion distribution we know that we cannot take the difference of two poisson distributions.

Hypothesis Testing: Wrong alternate hypothesis

Correlation & Regression: Choosing the appropriate model

Here, we shall discuss something called the Triangle inequality which states that . I thought this is rather important as I see too many students writing things like $ in complex numbers. This is really scary because it shows that they are not thinking when they are doing the question.

Students can argue that adding two number and applying modulus should give positive so we can split the positive numbers up. Now this is sufficiently true. But then what if we have negative numbers coming into play? Consider this

Then we see that .

So this is a big problem as and thus we cannot assume that relation above! So students please be really careful!

So now let us look at a simple relationship that many students memorise instead of understand. Below, we see a absolute function graph.

Now we all know that gives us . So how did that happen? Consider drawing a horizontal line, in the graph above. is less than only when . Similarly, is true only when or . I do hope that the graphical representation helps here.

I notice many students forget how discriminant works! I think I should inform A-level students that they need to know how it works and that is one thing they should not return to their O-level teachers. So I thought I share a bit on how to effectively, get it correct and also use it. At the same time, I hope to better the students’ understanding too.

Let us first look at the quadratic formula that is well engrained in our heads.

Now do we see a very familiar formula in there? Yes, its our discriminant formula, !!! So how does it work, alongside with roots. Let’s look at what a root is next, a root is loosely put, a solution to the equation. I hope it is slowly making sense.

When the discriminant is negative, we have a which is imaginary, that means we have NO real roots!!

And when the discriminant is zero, we have so we only have one single root, that is .

BUT if we have a positive discriminant, than due to the there, we end up with two roots.

So I do hope this clears up the air as to how we can relate some algebra with roots. 🙂

This is a question worth looking at from A-levels which test us on discriminant.